ET LITE SMIL I HVERDAGEN

Picture1.png

For noen år siden på vei fra Ringen kino, oppdaget jeg denne på en murvegg; Don't believe everything you think! Dette utsagnet ble jeg umiddelbart svært glad i.  Når jeg siden leste at mennesket tenker mellom 50-70000 tanker i døgnet (hvordan man har klart å regne ut dette, går over min forstand), så ble det enda mer viktig for meg å huske på at en tanke, bare er nettopp det, en tanke – og ikke nødvendigvis fakta. Jeg og mange med meg går ofte i fellen å betrakte tanker som fakta. Hvor galt det kan bære avsted kan historien om hammeren vise oss. Den går slik:

Jeg hørte denne historien for første gang av en kollega;
En mann vil henge opp et bilde. Han har en spiker, men ingen hammer. Naboen har en. Altså beslutter vår mann seg til å gå over dit for å låne hans. Men så får han betenkeligheter: «Sett at naboen ikke vil låne meg hammeren? I går nikket han bare flyktig da jeg hilste på ham. Kanskje han han hadde hastverk. Men kanskje forega han bare å ha hastverk fordi han ikke liker meg. Og hvorfor skulle han ikke like meg? Jeg har da alltid vært hyggelig mot ham.  Hva er det han egentlig innbiller seg? Hvis noen ville låne verktøy av meg, hadde jeg naturligvis lånt der bort med en gang. Så hvorfor vil ikke han låne meg hammeren sin? Hvordan kan man avslå en slik enkel tjeneste? Sånne folk forpester virkelig tilværelsen. Og så innbiller han seg attpå til at jeg er avhengig av ham. Bare fordi han har en hammer.  Nå har jeg virkelig fått nok! - Og så styrter han over ril naboen og ringer på døren. Naboen åpner, men før han rekker å si «God dags" skriker vår mann: «Bare behold den jævlige hammer’n din, din bølle!»      

Paul Watzlawick, «Være din egen ulykkes smed». Ex Libris.

Etter å ha hørt denne historien kunne jeg lett ha sporet av og latt tankene mine få; Hva kommer det av at han valgte å lese denne historien akkurat nå? Tenkte han kanskje at akkurat jeg er en sånn negativ surpomp av en sånn type som bare ser det negative i ting? Hvordan kan han tenke sånn om meg, som egentlig har mye godt humør og ofte kommer med gode løsninger? Hva er det han innbiller seg egentlig?

Nei; Just Stop it! Jeg har jo akkurat slått fast at jeg ikke vil tro på alt jeg tenker. Heldigvis. Jeg har jo lært ham å kjenne som det helt motsatte; en klok og vennlig og generøs person.

Fortellingen om hammeren er hentet fra  boken; ” Vær din egen ulykkes smed”-  og det vil jeg ikke være. I hvert fall ikke i dag.

Ha en strålende dag.

 

Svein Furnes
Sertifisert EMDR terapeut
CAC.

www.vub.no

THE QUEST FOR SAFETY

By the end of last year I had the privilege to attend a two days seminar arranged by Nordland sykehus in Bodø. The seminar was held by the American Dr Stephen Porges, a national and international well known scientists and researcher and the founder of The Polyvagal Theory.
The Polyvagal Theory is a sophisticated theory, so please excuse me if I do oversimplify this, which gives us an understanding of the biology of safety and danger. It's based of the subtle interplay between visceral experiences of our own bodies where the faces and voices of the people around us plays an important role of how we feel and act. So does the tone of the voices of other people. “In short, it explains why a kind face and tone from the people around us may dramatically affect whether we feel safe, in danger or in a life threatening situation. We are surprisingly attuned to subtle changes by the people around us.  Only small changes in the eyebrow, wrinkles around the eyes, how the lips are looking, the tone of the voice, the posters of the body and so on quickly gives us an signal of how the status of the emotion of the other person is. Is he calm and relaxed, is he afraid or is he hostile? When the message we receive from the other person is “I’m not dangerous, you are safe with me,” we relax.  It is important to notice that most of these processes are outside our conscious awareness. It just happens.
The Polyvagal Theory goes beyond the Fight and Flight mechanism and more on the social relationships. It also gives us an important supplement in our understanding of trauma and healing, by strengthening the body system for regulating arousal.
So far about the Polyvagal theory.

Together with the conference in Bodø we got several handouts. One that particular captured my interest was:”Making the World Safe for our Children: Down-regulating Defence and Up-regulating Social Engagement to ‘Optimise’ The Human Experience.”
As I am writing this article the tragedy in Orlando is only a couple of days away. Humans ability for hate and cruelty seems infinite, but luckily so do humans capacity for love and care for each other. Adults and children are daily bombarded with news about wars, terror, murder, child abuse, natural disasters, global warming and so on. We are all concerned, and one way or another affected by this, children as well as adults. The physical and psychological consequences by this are yet to be seen. But my fear is that they are going to be enormous. We already know that children exposed to danger suffer from an increased incidence of behaviour problems, learning delays, mental health issues and illness.
The ACE-study (Adverse Childhood Experiences) by Vincent Felitti & al has shown the long term effects by such experiences and they are terrible.
It's easy to believe that more and armed police in the streets and more Armed Forces; more surveillance will give us more safety. But there is little research that supports this. In other words, it will not make our children feel safe.

But what will make our children feel safe?

It is a well-established fact, I do believe, and that people interact with each other's nerve system. The Polyvagal theory proposes that safety is established by direct face to face interaction. Direct eye to eye contact together with warmly voices quickly lower defence mechanisms and provide more safety.  I do believe, in contrast to a friend of mine who is just waiting for the Internet to pass, that the Internet has come to stay and together with it all the devices like computers, tablets cell phones and so on.

But an important question to ask our self is how is this affecting our children's ability for safety? It seems like children, and adults, are more and more interacting with the electronically devices and less and less through direct eye and face contacts. Children still play together as a group but less with each other, and more with their computers. The answer is of course not to abandon all the electronic device and go back to play with stones and cones.
But the challenges for all of us,  researchers, teachers, politicians, parents and everybody else, is to re-establish the focus on the importance of social interactions and less on “social media” and find ways to combine the practical use of both.  Or to use Stephen Porges’ words: “Effective social interactions may actively dampen defence systems and, when defence is down-regulated, our physiological state provides neural opportunities for us to learn and form strong social bonds while simultaneously supporting health, growth and restoration.”
We are all entitled to give an opinion here. And may be this could be a task for The Sound-Mind Community in the future?

Svein Furnes
Certified EMDR therapist
CAC

 

References:
Stephen Porges, at seminar in Bodø by the end of April 2016.

Stephen Porges; Making the World Safe for our Children: Down-regulating Defence and Up-regulating Social Engagement to ‘Optimise’ The Human Experience.”. Making the World Safe for our Children: Down-regulating Defence and Up-regulating Social Engagement to ‘Optimise’ The Human Experience.” Children Australia. Volume 40, Number 2 2015.

Porges and Geller: Therapeutic Presence:” Neurophysiological Mechanism Mediating Feeling Safe in Therapeutic Relationships.” Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 2014, Vo. 24, No 3.

Porges and Furman: “The Early Development of the Autonomic Nervous System Provides a Neural Platform for Social Behaviour: A Polyvagal Perspective.” Infant and Child Development 20: 2011.

Van der Kolk, Bessel: “The Body Keeps the Score.  Brain, Mind and the Body in the Healing of Trauma.” Viking 2013